On the topic of social media, I was recently pointed towards the work of Steve Cliff. I recommend his Rebooting Democracy essay.

You’re right about the potential for social media, and to highlight the lack of it in this particular project. Without seeking to defend this, it’s worth explaining that the document – a Command Paper – was a statement of government policy and described progress on delivery, rather than being a more consultative document. If there’s one abuse of social media worse than any other, I think it’s trying to ask people to discuss something when you’re not in a position to listen and interact accordingly.

But your forum suggestion is a good one, and it’s a point not lost on my team, I can assure you. Watch this space and we’ll keep you posted on how we get on with opening up policymaking in some of our other policy areas…

I came to your site through the link on your ShowUsABetterWay entry. Congratulations for your work on the Work Skills site (all the more impressive since you seem to have done it while heavily pregnant!).

I have to agree, though, that it is not a great leap forward in terms of social media. My main problem is not with the site, which is very well presented, but with the report itself, which is basically an advertisement for how fantastic the government is.

By comparison, the DirectGov news item about the report distilled the key piece of information in the second line – “…compulsory training…”. This information doesn’t appear in the report until the bottom of the second page of the executive summary, using softer language – “…require unemployed people to attend training…”. To get to this information, you first have to make it past an enormous close-up of Gordon Brown, and propaganda from him and two of his ministers. Calling it propaganda is no exaggeration, that’s literally what it is.

This is where social media should step in. It has the potential to provide an antidote to the constant government spin, which only serves to increase the public’s cynical view of the political process. A good, and very simple, way to start would be to change the “Send us your feedback” link into a discussion forum, so that the public can air their thoughts and questions, and the department can respond publicly.

The danger with this approach is that the forum becomes overwhelmed with uninformed, vitriolic attacks. So why not encourage the people from the video interviews to contribute as well, to provide some balance?

Just for fun, I’ll send this simple suggestion through the “send us your feedback” link as well, to see which approach receives a better response!