<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: One day, all this will be blogs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.helpfultechnology.com/2010/02/one-day-all-this-will-be-blogs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.helpfultechnology.com/2010/02/one-day-all-this-will-be-blogs/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 14:01:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fantasy CMS for government</title>
		<link>http://blog.helpfultechnology.com/2010/02/one-day-all-this-will-be-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-32137</link>
		<dc:creator>Fantasy CMS for government</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 21:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.helpfultechnology.com/?p=692#comment-32137</guid>
		<description>[...] The stakes are pretty high, if you ask me, with the reputations of individual digital teams and the profession as a whole at the mercy of what their chosen system will let them do. (&#8220;That cool thing you saw on that website you like? Sorry boss, we can&#8217;t do that with our CMS.&#8221;) Vendors should be mindful of the power they yield, for as long as they still yield it. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The stakes are pretty high, if you ask me, with the reputations of individual digital teams and the profession as a whole at the mercy of what their chosen system will let them do. (&#8220;That cool thing you saw on that website you like? Sorry boss, we can&#8217;t do that with our CMS.&#8221;) Vendors should be mindful of the power they yield, for as long as they still yield it. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CMS Catchup.. &#171; Matt Jukes</title>
		<link>http://blog.helpfultechnology.com/2010/02/one-day-all-this-will-be-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-31463</link>
		<dc:creator>CMS Catchup.. &#171; Matt Jukes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 20:24:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.helpfultechnology.com/?p=692#comment-31463</guid>
		<description>[...] Steph and Simon wrote about the idea of using multiple instances of WordPress to build a different kind [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Steph and Simon wrote about the idea of using multiple instances of WordPress to build a different kind [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin Grant, We Are Social</title>
		<link>http://blog.helpfultechnology.com/2010/02/one-day-all-this-will-be-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-28093</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin Grant, We Are Social</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 00:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.helpfultechnology.com/?p=692#comment-28093</guid>
		<description>Hey Steph - pretty impressive and cool stuff - congrats to you, Jen, Simon, BIS and ultimately, all of us...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Steph &#8211; pretty impressive and cool stuff &#8211; congrats to you, Jen, Simon, BIS and ultimately, all of us&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon Dickson</title>
		<link>http://blog.helpfultechnology.com/2010/02/one-day-all-this-will-be-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-27985</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon Dickson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.helpfultechnology.com/?p=692#comment-27985</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve finally managed to get my own slightly more tech-centric up on my own blog:

http://puffbox.com/2010/02/10/networked-blogs-our-latest-science-experiment/

We had such fine plans to synchronise blog posts, too. Sorry I let you down, Steph. :)

Interesting suggestion from Will C about maintaining links regardless of departmental changes. One idea to toss in: there &lt;i&gt;is&lt;/i&gt; an open-source, PHP-based, WordPress-friendly &#039;short URL&#039; engine which might be the basis for this. You&#039;d still be looking at some manual intervention and some crafty find-and-replacing if/when sites changed; but if it&#039;s all in one place, maybe that&#039;s bearable?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve finally managed to get my own slightly more tech-centric up on my own blog:</p>
<p><a href="http://puffbox.com/2010/02/10/networked-blogs-our-latest-science-experiment/" rel="nofollow">http://puffbox.com/2010/02/10/networked-blogs-our-latest-science-experiment/</a></p>
<p>We had such fine plans to synchronise blog posts, too. Sorry I let you down, Steph. <img src='http://blog.helpfultechnology.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Interesting suggestion from Will C about maintaining links regardless of departmental changes. One idea to toss in: there <i>is</i> an open-source, PHP-based, WordPress-friendly &#8216;short URL&#8217; engine which might be the basis for this. You&#8217;d still be looking at some manual intervention and some crafty find-and-replacing if/when sites changed; but if it&#8217;s all in one place, maybe that&#8217;s bearable?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Halliday</title>
		<link>http://blog.helpfultechnology.com/2010/02/one-day-all-this-will-be-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-27961</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Halliday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 15:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.helpfultechnology.com/?p=692#comment-27961</guid>
		<description>Great stuff - I tend to think of a content cloud which includes everything we do digitally and its then a matter of working out how to get users to interact with it. My big issue at the moment is its fine to create stuff but whats the point if no one reads it (is that enough anyway - change behaviour, start a discussion...), or does anything with it - pdfs anyone.  

I imagine that over time users will have their own dashboard (igoogle type) and pull or let the relevant content be fired at them and that the sort of static sites we have been used to in the past have a limited past, i.e. agree with above - of course. Makes me wonder therefore about the future of the supersites....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great stuff &#8211; I tend to think of a content cloud which includes everything we do digitally and its then a matter of working out how to get users to interact with it. My big issue at the moment is its fine to create stuff but whats the point if no one reads it (is that enough anyway &#8211; change behaviour, start a discussion&#8230;), or does anything with it &#8211; pdfs anyone.  </p>
<p>I imagine that over time users will have their own dashboard (igoogle type) and pull or let the relevant content be fired at them and that the sort of static sites we have been used to in the past have a limited past, i.e. agree with above &#8211; of course. Makes me wonder therefore about the future of the supersites&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Williams</title>
		<link>http://blog.helpfultechnology.com/2010/02/one-day-all-this-will-be-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-27927</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 13:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.helpfultechnology.com/?p=692#comment-27927</guid>
		<description>If Neil gets &lt;a href=&quot;http://coi.gov.uk/blogs/digigov/author/dpulling/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;David&#039;s&lt;/a&gt; way, more accurately, but I&#039;ll admit to being a bigger than average fan of joining gov sites up with BBC-esque topbars. 

You and I have discussed this policy blog farm vision a couple of times before and the more I think about it, the more I agree it should be the future. It has potential like nothing else to create direct, unnmediated engagement between officials and their audiences (which can only lead to better policy-making), and for a fraction of the cost of the behemoth sites. And how much static content is useful in an increasingly real-time medium? Beyond the basic facts about the organisation and what it&#039;s about,  some info on established legal and policy frameworks, arguably not much.

Things like accessibility, copyright, writing effective web copy, legal deposit of publications, propriety, parliamentary privilege, consistent messaging [and so on] would still need to be managed somehow, but oughtn&#039;t scupper the idea of delegated, direct communication. In fact, I rather suspect it can&#039;t be stopped.

@Will - great ideas as ever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Neil gets <a href="http://coi.gov.uk/blogs/digigov/author/dpulling/" rel="nofollow">David&#8217;s</a> way, more accurately, but I&#8217;ll admit to being a bigger than average fan of joining gov sites up with BBC-esque topbars. </p>
<p>You and I have discussed this policy blog farm vision a couple of times before and the more I think about it, the more I agree it should be the future. It has potential like nothing else to create direct, unnmediated engagement between officials and their audiences (which can only lead to better policy-making), and for a fraction of the cost of the behemoth sites. And how much static content is useful in an increasingly real-time medium? Beyond the basic facts about the organisation and what it&#8217;s about,  some info on established legal and policy frameworks, arguably not much.</p>
<p>Things like accessibility, copyright, writing effective web copy, legal deposit of publications, propriety, parliamentary privilege, consistent messaging [and so on] would still need to be managed somehow, but oughtn&#8217;t scupper the idea of delegated, direct communication. In fact, I rather suspect it can&#8217;t be stopped.</p>
<p>@Will &#8211; great ideas as ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Callaghan</title>
		<link>http://blog.helpfultechnology.com/2010/02/one-day-all-this-will-be-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-27882</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Callaghan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 11:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.helpfultechnology.com/?p=692#comment-27882</guid>
		<description>Hi Steph, I like the sound of your blog based future.

I&#039;ve not been in Govt for as long as many people here, but it seems to me that policy team wishes generally seem to be one of the following:

- A stream of announcements, either new or noteworthy (i.e. your average blog)

- Document store

- Ability to message the audience (most have heard of newsletters but all seem to get RSS, Twitter, Feedburner notifcations when you show them)

- Feedback mechanism (everything from a panel with plain and simple contact details to commentable pages, twitter accounts forums and more)

- Handful of other page types (e.g. speeches, RDFa consultations)

- Interactive features (quiz, polls, commentable docs and whatever you invent next Steph!)

Throw all this together on a cheap and easy to customise platform and you&#039;re on to a winner. 

I&#039;ve been thinking about a few ideas on top:

- How can users who&#039;ve happened upon highly specific content such as Society &amp; Society see the bigger picture and navigate to broader themes such as Science Comms &gt; Science &gt; Innovation generally &gt; Growth generally

- Wouldn&#039;t it be nice if urls and docs could stay the same irrespective of MoG changes (give every post, every doc and organisation a joinedup.gov permalink?)

- How great would it be if users had a more seamless experience when navigating from one govt department site to another? Could we throw in a bit of personalised content at the same time?

You&#039;re probably way ahead of me already, I&#039;m just throwing these thoughts in just in case. I&#039;ve been sketching a few bits and pieces and can post them somewhere when they&#039;re a bit more together.

I&#039;m keen to hear more about any joined-up-without-being-centralised initatives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Steph, I like the sound of your blog based future.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve not been in Govt for as long as many people here, but it seems to me that policy team wishes generally seem to be one of the following:</p>
<p>- A stream of announcements, either new or noteworthy (i.e. your average blog)</p>
<p>- Document store</p>
<p>- Ability to message the audience (most have heard of newsletters but all seem to get RSS, Twitter, Feedburner notifcations when you show them)</p>
<p>- Feedback mechanism (everything from a panel with plain and simple contact details to commentable pages, twitter accounts forums and more)</p>
<p>- Handful of other page types (e.g. speeches, RDFa consultations)</p>
<p>- Interactive features (quiz, polls, commentable docs and whatever you invent next Steph!)</p>
<p>Throw all this together on a cheap and easy to customise platform and you&#8217;re on to a winner. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been thinking about a few ideas on top:</p>
<p>- How can users who&#8217;ve happened upon highly specific content such as Society &amp; Society see the bigger picture and navigate to broader themes such as Science Comms &gt; Science &gt; Innovation generally &gt; Growth generally</p>
<p>- Wouldn&#8217;t it be nice if urls and docs could stay the same irrespective of MoG changes (give every post, every doc and organisation a joinedup.gov permalink?)</p>
<p>- How great would it be if users had a more seamless experience when navigating from one govt department site to another? Could we throw in a bit of personalised content at the same time?</p>
<p>You&#8217;re probably way ahead of me already, I&#8217;m just throwing these thoughts in just in case. I&#8217;ve been sketching a few bits and pieces and can post them somewhere when they&#8217;re a bit more together.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m keen to hear more about any joined-up-without-being-centralised initatives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Nellies</title>
		<link>http://blog.helpfultechnology.com/2010/02/one-day-all-this-will-be-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-27821</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Nellies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 08:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.helpfultechnology.com/?p=692#comment-27821</guid>
		<description>They all ready have for many small companies and see no reason why this can&#039;t be expanded to larger sites as you have explained above. Sometimes we all get caught up developing mega rich content sites and forget the lesson less is more, especially if focused and inergrated with  social media tools in a coherent strategy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They all ready have for many small companies and see no reason why this can&#8217;t be expanded to larger sites as you have explained above. Sometimes we all get caught up developing mega rich content sites and forget the lesson less is more, especially if focused and inergrated with  social media tools in a coherent strategy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->